Leftist always doesn’t mean pro-China’: I am reposting this interview because it is a clean break from the usual India-Sri Lanka trope. Refreshing young voice. Please listen if inclined. Also, it gladdens our heart that we are seen as balanced, calm and reasonable voice amidst the cacophony of trivia. For that please read the comments in the YouTube video.
What does the election of Anura Kumara Dissanayake of the Janatha Vimukthi Peramuna, a Marxist–Leninist communist party, as the President of Sri Lanka in a run off with 42 per cent of the vote on Sunday mean for Sri Lanka’s foreign policy, particularly India-Sri Lanka relations? AKD, as he is known, is also the leader of the socialist political alliance Jathika Jana Balawegaya (JJB), or National People’s Power (NPP), which he established in 2019. The JJB alliance, which won 3.8 per cent of the vote in the last Presidential elections in 2020.
And does the fact that he leads a socialist alliance mean the new government will be pro-China? Those were some of the questions we asked Nilanthan Niruthan. the Executive Director of the Centre for Law And Security Studies in Colombo and a reputed geopolitical analyst.
“Our foreign policy is often the result of whoever’s in power, rather than on fixed strategic issues. So it’s too soon for us to tell which way AKD would go in terms of alignment,” says Niruthan, who frequently writes for international publications on diverse issues like global security, international law and geopolitical trends. He is also a lecturer at the National Defense College, the highest institution of military education in Sri Lanka.
“The official position right now is non-alignment, much like the standard Sri Lankan foreign policy over the last several decades has been. But there are questions over whether that can even be practical in today’s day and age. Can a country like Sri Lanka actually thrive by being nonaligned in a multilateral world?
As for being pro-china, this is not a mandate to turn Sri Lanka into a Marxist country as per the JVP vision or anything like that,” he says. “This was simply a mandate to deviate from and rectify many of the mistakes that were made in the past, and it was an expression of great anger and dissatisfaction for what’s happened in the past, and also a call for hope, a call for a new kind of politics. In a way, it’s interesting because you could almost see parallels of the Trump election and, even the BJP’s rise to national power in India, where it’s almost seen as a symbol, as a fight against dynastic politics, as a draining of the swamp, as a beacon, electing someone who can hold the people accountable for the plunder of the past.”
If anything, AKD has been extremely critical of the way in which China has dealt with Sri Lanka, whether it’s the way in which national strategic assets like Hambantota port, or the way in which we borrowed large sums, unsustainable sums of money to the point where we found ourselves in a debt trap,” he adds. “He, (AKD) has been highly critical of all of that. So under AKD presidency, maybe he will have a protectionist foreign policy where he does not want foreign powers involved here too much: https://stratnewsglobal.com/india/its-shocking-how-badly-connected-india-and-sri-lanka-are/
