Latest News
Handing over of tamed elephants to present owners
December 01, 2021

Delivering the judgement, the Supreme Court held that any compromise of the independence of the Attorney-General harms the rule of law.
The Supreme Court today held that the Attorney General’s extensive statutory powers in relation to criminal investigations and prosecutions are held in public trust. The Court further observed that any compromise of the independence of the Attorney-General will have a negative impact on the rule of law.
The Supreme Court made these observations while delivering its order regarding the preliminary objections raised by the Attorney General in respect of a Fundamental Rights petition filed challenging the cabinet decision to hand over tamed animals to their present owners and to withdraw these cases in which legal action is being taken.
“The Attorney-General is vested with extensive statutory powers in relation to criminal investigations and prosecutions. Such powers are held in public trust. They must be exercised for the due administration of justice according to the rule of law which is the basis of our Constitution. Any type of dictation from whatever quarter will compromise the independence of the Attorney-General unless such dictation is permitted by law”, Justice Janak De Silva observed.
Five petitioners including Centre for Environmental Justice had filed a Fundamental Rights petition challenging the Cabinet Memorandum dated 12th March 2021 submitted by Prime Minister Mahinda Rajapaksa and Minister of Wildlife C.B. Ratnayake titled “Taking a policy decision in respect of tamed elephants where judicial proceedings and investigations are being conducted and transferring the ownership”.
The first objection of the Attorney General was that the original petition should be dismissed for non-joinder of parties. The second objection was regarding the decision of petitioners’ to file an amended petition. The third objection is that the amended petition has been filed to cure the defects in the original petition. The Supreme Court three-judge-bench comprising Justice Gamini Amarasekera, Justice Janak De Silva and Justice Kumuduni Wickremasinghe concluded that the amended petition is not time barred. The Supreme Court further held that it is the bounden duty of the Court to secure and advance the fundamental rights guaranteed by the Constitution. The Supreme Court decided to overrule the preliminary objections citing that these are proceedings brought on behalf of the public at large.
RELATED NEWS
View all

Latest News
Cardinal calls for further probe into X-Press Pearl environmental damage
Aug 14, 2026

Latest News
Reservoir levels fall sharply in eastern Sri Lanka
Aug 14, 2026

Latest News
Government launches Rs. 2.5 billion revenue-generating development programme
Aug 14, 2026

Latest News
EU helps Lanka build eco-label system
Aug 13, 2026





